Reflections on Project 3 Draft

I reviewed Clay and Ann Emilie drafts. My draft needs quite a bit of work and some graphical design that is fitting for an Economist.com article. Below are my answers to reflection questions.

mcsporran, john "Reflections in the Mist" 04/17/2015 via flickr.com Attribution 2.0 Generic

• Who reviewed your Project 3 draft?

Awaiting Feedback

• What did you think and/or feel about the feedback you received?

Awaiting Feedback

• What aspects of Project 3 need to most work going forward? How do you plan on addressing these areas? 

The work that needs to be done the most is focusing on an evaluative argument instead of leading my paper with a casual argument which is confusing and makes my article read like a research paper. Next, I need to create or research more graphs that explain the amount of money spent on nuclear fusion research to compliment my evaluative argument. Finally, some aesthetic choices that match the Economist.com website is necessary to complete my article.

• How are you feeling overall about the direction of your project after peer review and/or instructor conferences this week?

After meeting with my instructor, I felt confident that I can complete my paper in a way that is fitting and reflects my abilities as a writer. The amount of research that I still need to complete is substantial but further analysis of my argument style and specific subject will lessen the amount of total research I need.